Notes and Credits
Home Background Survey Information Logbook Images Survey Results Links Recognizing Rebuilds
Yugo M59 Data M59/66 Data D5000x thru G2299xx M59/66 Data H2036xx thru M5218xx M59/66 Data N52010x thru End
I have received several e-mails containing more information about the Yugo M59/66 SKS69
rifle. I would like to pass this information on. Near the start of this survey I received an e-mail from Ben Hall who had in the past conducted a similar survey to mine. I have incorporated the data from his survey into mine. His survey contained data on 100 to 150 rifles. I have his permission to quote him from our correspondence.
“Just finished reading your webpage, and I'm
afraid I've got bad news on the year of manufacture and logbooks:
Bottom line - After many months of
research, I ran into a guy who works at Marstar in Canada, who has had
extensive business dealings with the plant who made the Yugo SKS rifles. Literally, he's made close to a hundred
trips to the factory where these were made, and has spoken with the management
that made these rifles. He's asked all
the questions that you and I sought answers to.
Basically, there is no correlation between
serial number and year of manufacture.
They were simply labeled in order starting at 00001 for the 59's, and
A000001 for the 59/66's with exceptions for some that were made for overseas
sale to nations in Africa. Rifles were
often renumbered when overhauled, so that tells us nothing. Same thing with the night sight
configuration and the six hole versus no hole grenade launcher - these were
retrofitted as rifles came in from the field, and say nothing about original
date of manfacture. No night sights and
the holed grenade launcher was the original configuration, which was later
changed to add non-tritium night sights, then removed the holes in the launcher
becuase they didn't regulate grenade launching distance as expected, then the
change to tritium night sights.
I originally thought that an A prefix
would be 1966, B prefix 1967, etc...
That is not the case. Plus, any
records that were kept that would determine year of production have been
destroyed, be it from the NATO bombing or simply because the factory didn't
think they were important to be kept.
Also, the logbooks tell us nothing. According to the factory managers and a
former armorer of the Yugoslav Army I've run into, the books that were issued
with the rifles were turned in and destroyed when the rifle was overhauled or
repaired, and a new one issued. Old
rifle + overhaul = new rifle = new book.
The same happened when the rifle was transferred between units. All you'll get from the log books is the
last time the rifle was overhauled, serviced, or transferred between
units. This is why 99% of all of the
logbooks have the date of manufacture blank - becuase they don't know when they
were made! The only thing we can gather
from the log book is date of last issue or overhaul...”
I feel that
some of the data collected so far seems to contradict what Ben was told
concerning the serial number prefix to year correlation. Hopefully more data will confirm or
contradict the possibility of a correlation.
I felt to be totally honest in sharing the information I have received I
needed to share the above information.
I received an e-mail from John
Hannan regarding his observations on variances he has observed in the serial
number locations, lettering sizes and changes in features. I found the information helpful, and would
like to pass it on. The following
information is reproduced with John’s permission.
Reflections on Yugoslavian SKS’s
Following are my
thoughts on the progression of manufacturing changes on Yugoslavian SKS’s based
on looking at a number of rifles, but without the benefit of the log books now
becoming available.
C block – Model
59, with the features of the Russian M45 SKS.
One notable feature is that the serial number on the bolt carrier is on
the left side rather than the top. The
receiver serial number is in rather small characters.
D block – serial
D-74652 has the small serial numbers like on the M59, there is a faint serial
number on the left side of the bolt carrier, but it has been reapplied to the
top of the bolt carrier in larger characters, there is also a serial number on
the side of the magazine housing and the bottom of the trigger guard that look
like they were applied later. The gun
has a non-ported flash hider, but no night sights. Various parts have “part numbers”on them. The stock is the old dark wood variety. This gun has obviously been reworked. I wonder if it started life as an M59. Other “D” blocks I have seen may or may not
have night sights; several have the serial number still on the left side of the
bolt carrier.
E block – serial
E-121072 has the small serial number, but no evidence of a serial number on the
side of the bolt carrier. There are no
serial numbers on the gun other than the receiver and the top of the bolt. There is a lightly scratched number on the
bottom of the trigger guard. Night
sights, ported grenade launcher. Wood is the early dark type. “Part numbers” on various parts.
I did see an e
block, serial E- 86397 with the serial number on the left side of the bolt
carrier, no night sights, ported grenade launcher. Other than the bolt and receiver no other parts were serial
numbered. I wish I had bought this gun
to look at it further. I did not since the stock was renumbered.
F block – serial
F-167098 has a larger character set serial number on the receiver and bolt
top. No other parts are serialized
except for a light number crudely electropenned on the bottom of the trigger
guard. Ported grenade launcher,
phosphor night sites, part numbers. Dark wood but showing more grain than
previous rifles.
G block – serial
G182222 large character set, with serials also on the side of magazine housing,
rear top cover, and bottom of trigger guard.
Serials are the same size and look like they were “panagraphed” in some
fashion. Ported grenade launcher,
night sights, part numbers. Dark
grained wood.
I saw G206xxx,
which had an obviously repaired stock, with a section forward of the breech
having been removed and a new piece inletted.
The interesting thing was that the repair and the area around it had a
number of proofs in the wood “BK” in a
box, like is seen on the underside of the stocks behind the trigger guard and
also like you see on the Yugo Mauser M-48’s.
I guess this was a repair proof or mark.
H block –
H241217 much like the “G” block. A
ported grenade launcher, phosphor sights, part numbers with a dark grained
stock.
J block –
J372253 much like the “H” block, except the grenade launcher is not
ported. Phosphor sights, part numbers,
dark stock with grain.
K block. Much like the J block, but K388742 has
smaller size part numbers on the bolt, and the wood is a lighter color with a
grain.
O block - The
part numbers are no longer present.
O630729 has non-ported grenade launcher, phosphor sights and a somewhat
nicely grained stock, somewhat darker than the “K” block gun. The stock has a numeral mark of “2” on the
bottom vs. the boxed “BK”.
P block –
P615722 has non-ported grenade launcher, phosphor sights, and a nicely grained
stock, but much lighter than O630729.
Stock is marked “2” on the bottom.
S block – serial
S665969 has the phosphor sights, the light oak wood with no grain, and has
smaller size serial numbers than the previous guns, although the number on the
magazine is a larger font than on the receiver. The serial number in the bolt carrier is deeply cut, not a
photoengraving like the previous guns appear to be.
T- block – serial
T676066 has the phosphor sights, light oak wood and both large and small serial
numbers on the parts like on S665969.
B,C block – have
small serial numbers, on all parts, including the bolt, which is a smaller font
than that in the “S” block. B716535 has
tritium sights, and light oak wood, no porting on the grenade launcher. Serial C726415 which is the highest I have
seen appears to be reworked in that the serial number on the receiver is not in
the white, a second serial number has been cut on the side of the magazine
housing (although it is the same number as the original one which remains on
the magazine the new one is in a larger font), the serial number on the bottom
of the trigger housing has been polished over, refinished and recut in larger
characters. The serial number on the
rear of the top cover has not been redone, but has been finished over and is no
longer in the white.
What does this say about
the progression of features of these guns? (my hypothesis)
Some M59’s may have
been modified to the M66 configuration, although I can not identify one for
certain that has been, the logbooks may help on this.
The earliest
M66’s have ported grenade launchers (not all), and no night sights (not all),
and are serialized only on the received and bolt carrier, and have part numbers
on bolt, handguard, takedown lever, gas tube, gas piston, top cover, front of
trigger housing, etc.
Later guns had
night sights; serial numbers were added to the magazine, top cover and trigger
guard. The characters used for the
serial numbers got bigger. The wood got lighter and showed more grain. Wood color/type is hard to judge and may
have been replaced on specific guns – I plan to line up the pieces I have and
try to photograph them together to see if there is a natural progression.
The ports were
eliminated from the grenade launcher between the H & J block, the part
numbers were eliminated between the “K” and “O” block, the wood was changed to
a “white oak” and the serial number size became smaller. The phosphor sights were replaced by tritium
sights (“Z” block?)
The other
amazing fact to me is that it appears these guns were made from 1959 until 1989
based on your dating matrix, which is a long time. Another interesting point is that there is a Zrak scope and rail
set, supposedly for these guns, which is marked M89. If that is the year of adoption, why is it so late in the
manufacture of these guns?
Some other
thoughts on serial numbers.
I still think
the letters represent the year of manufacture. Randy Bessler had a Yugo M-57 Tokarev pistol on his web
site. The frame serial number was
preceded by the letter “H”. (it also
had part numbers like the SKS’s). I saw
two of the infamous M76 sniper rifles.
One had the letter “H” ahead of the serial number on the receiver; the
other (which had a higher serial number) had the date 1989 on the receiver
under the model number, but no letter code.
Many of the Yugo
M59/66’s have a number penciled on the stock beside the trigger housing, this
number is also electropenned under the trigger assembly, under the rear sight
leaf, the front bottom of the gas tube, and maybe other locations. I assume
these are assembly numbers to keep track of the parts during finishing and
assembly and that the serial numbers were applied after final finishing, which
is why I think original guns will show their serials in the white.
A final thought
– we call these rifles M59/66’s. The
logbooks and the packing lists I have seen designate them as M59/66A. I wonder what the “A” stands for. Obviously there will continue to be much to
learn about these fascinating rifles.
I have also received several other e-mails referring to “assembly numbers.” Unfortunately I deleted these e-mails or I would post them. The explanation of these numbers is a follows. When the rifle was built the parts were numbered with an assembly number to keep all the parts to a particular rifle together. When the rifle was completed the receiver was serial numbered and the serial number was added to the various parts. The assembly numbers should not be confused with the part numbers that appear on some of the parts. A part number will have the format x.xx.xxx . A good example of this is the part number visible (0.00.022) on the bolt carrier of the rifle in the second picture on the “variations” page.
I would like to thank everyone who has submitted data for my survey. Also I would like to acknowledge everyone who has sent me the various pictures I have posted in my web page. Howard Bearse deserves a special recognition for his contribution on the English Logbook pages and the variations in the grenade launchers. Lastly I am grateful for all the e-mails of encouragement I receive about my project.
If you have questions or comments please contact me at yugosurvey@hotmail.com
Please put “yugo” in the subject line of the e-mail so I do not delete the message as spam.
All information copyright 2003 Glen Burton. Reproduction without permission prohibited.
Last
updated 10-2-2003